Copyrighted material


IBM and the Fine Art of Bribery

by Alexander Cockburn

Major U.S. banks are up to their armpits in the drug trade
That previously impassable security fence known as "Swiss banking secrecy" is displaying signs of disrepair beyond the recent onslaught on Swiss money-washing for the Nazis. Prosecutors have been tracing the millions lodged by Raul Salinas, brother of Carlos Salinas, Mexico's former president. And now, an Argentine judge is holding the code words that will help in unlocking the secrets of the great IBM bribe scandal that has been a headline item in that country for the past three years.

We'll get into the fragrant details of the IBM affair shortly, but one remarkably constant feature in stories about corrupt money finding its way into secret bank accounts in Geneva is how seldom U.S. banks seem -- at least in the U.S. press -- to be substantively involved.

Indeed, it's something of a miracle that with the annual total value of the U.S. cocaine trade estimated by the White House in 1995 to be $38 billion, and with the United States share being about 70 percent of global demand, there has never been any resolute effort by the United States press to ratify the obvious: Major U.S. banks have been up to their armpits in the drug trade for many years.


The business of bribery
The British used to believe that their women were more virtuous and their politicians more honest than all others, and even though it hasn't been so long since the great corporate bribery scandals of the '70s, epitomized by Lockheed's adventures in Japan, there's a certain chasteness in the press here in focusing on how U.S. corporations comport themselves abroad. When the subject does come up, it's couched in the forgiving thought that since dirty foreign corporations try to buy their way into markets with corrupting payments, it would be foolish -- unpatriotic, even -- for U.S. corporations not to do likewise.

The CIA, eager to justify its miserable existence by expanding into commercial espionage, buttressed this bribe- to- survive position by leaking estimates three years ago that bribery landed foreign companies $36 billion worth of business in 1994 at the expense of U.S. companies. Marring this rationale was the fact that in South Korea, General Dynamics was accused of handing out bribes to win a contract at the expense of McDonnell Douglas, and in Argentina, all of IBM's competitors for a contract with Banco Nacion (the national bank) were American.

Back in 1993, Banco Nacion decided to computerize its entire operation. The bid specs were picked up by IBM and two rivals. But then, all of a sudden, Banco Nacion withdrew the specs and rewrote them in such a fashion that only IBM could satisfy the new criteria. In July of 1994, IBM won the contract, bidding a little more than $249 million. Six months later, an Argentine audit showed that $37 million of IBM's money had gone to pay a small Argentine company for "services."

Why would IBM put out such a wad of money to get a $249 million contract? If IBM got the monopoly on hardware, software and services for Argentina's bank, its executives could reasonably assume that other banks might get the same equipment and services and so too might Argentina's Internal Revenue Service. In other words, $37 million might buy IBM the prize of furnishing the computerized data systems for all government and private banking functions.


Argentina has warrants out for senior IBM executives
As the facts were raptly discussed in the Argentine press, notably La Nacion, in 1995, IBM HQ in Armonk, N.Y., preserved a stiff upper lip, with muffled language about "instances where established business procedures and management controls were either ignored or circumvented." It's a big company, admittedly, but $37 million is not a small sum, and the prime function of any home office is to OK expenses and count the money.

For almost three years, an Argentine federal judge, Adolfo Bagnasco, tried to get Swiss banking officials to disclose how much money is hidden in numbered accounts containing IBM's alleged cash bribe to officials of Banco Nacion. The Swiss stonewalled and riposted by asking nasty questions about "disappeared" persons in Argentina. But on March 28, Bagnasco was told by Carla del Ponte, the Swiss "general procurer" -- an omnivalent title if there ever was one -- that she was giving him the green light. Soon, Bagnasco was hinting broadly that the Swiss accounts, code-named ABFICUS and FILASA, showed that the cash shooting around the world between Switzerland, Argentina and Luxembourg had actually originated in the United States.

Bagnasco is demanding that senior IBM executives based in Armonk should come to Argentina to face questioning. There are already warrants out for four of them in Argentina, and Bagnasco threatens to issue an international order for arrest, meaning that like Argentine torturers, IBM execs will never dare leave their own jurisdiction. Maybe the Argentines will put some of their old torturers to work, sending them up as kidnapping squads to infiltrate Armonk and heist the CEO and his lieutenants, just as Bush did with Noriega. No one will be safe.

Argentina is convulsed with this story. In the United States, all is sedate calm. There is a federal prosecutor, Kerry Lawrence, in White Plains, N.Y., looking into the alleged bribery scandal in the context of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Argentina has had its commotions over the "disappeared." There are vanished people and also vanished billions in whose cause, ultimately, those "disappeared" men and women were murdered. Untold billions slithering their way from bank to bank, the criminal surplus of the world system.

© Creators Syndicate

Comments? Send a letter to the editor.

Albion Monitor April 22, 1998 (http://www.monitor.net/monitor)

All Rights Reserved.

Contact rights@monitor.net for permission to use in any format.