|
On rural
reservations, health care delivery is erratic and resources are lacking. Staff turnover at federal medical facilities such as IHS is extremely high, employees are overworked and often inaccessible to the populations they serve; one South Dakota IHS clinic serves an area half the size of New Jersey, and no longer has inpatient facilities due to budget cuts.
Statistically, teenage pregnancy is far and away the highest among Native Americans than in any other ethnic group. And with the nearest clinic sometimes hundreds of miles distant, long-lasting contraceptives like Depo and Norplant may seem good alternatives.
But health problems common to Native American women also make Depo's side effects more dangerous. There is a much higher incidence of obesity, heart disease and adult-onset diabetes, making glucose intolerance and high lipid levels potentially lethal.
Management problems at IHS also make it questionable whether women have adequate counseling. Though IHS guidelines state that Depo Provera should only be prescribed when alternative methods cannot be used, interviews with users seem to indicate that the Indian Health Service is very eager to have women use Depo; about half claimed that Depo was recommended over other forms of contraception.
In a small study done in South Dakota by the Native American Women's Health Education Resource Center in cooperation with the National Women's Health Network, over 80 percent of the women were IHS clients, and all used Depo Provera.
Only one woman in the study reported signing a consent form; testimonies indicate that incomplete or incorrect information about the drug and its side effects was given in a majority of cases, and that a very high majority experienced some or many of the known side effects. Of the women who sought treatment for the effects, over 80 percent claimed that their problems were trivialized or ignored.
A "disturbingly low percentage" of these women, according to the study, were informed of the possible long-term effects of Depo Provera, especially the arguably unknown risks of fetal exposure in utero, and increased risk of certain kinds of cancer. In several instances, the IHS has dismissed the claims of women who felt they miscarried as a result of Depo. IHS has been slow to respond to these issues.
And despite the fact that Upjohn provides its guidelines with the product, 1993 Depo guidelines from an IHS clinic in Gallup, New Mexico, state that Depo is safe for breast feeding women, and that it is to be given within seven days of menstruation; if this is not possible, then the woman is to be tested for pregnancy. Upjohn recommends administering Depo in the first five days of menstruation, or not at all, and that breast feeding women should wait six weeks.
|