That's hardly an illuminating answer. For more than a century the Mormons clung tightly to their well-documented, race-tinged dogma that blacks were an inferior race, could not be priests, serve on missions or be married in the temple. They repeatedly cited the Old Testament curse of Ham as a cover for their unabashed racial bigotry. Mormon church leaders didn't budge from making pronouncements about God's alleged curse against blacks, even when other fundamentalist groups backpedaled -- at least publicly -- from using the Bible to justify racism. Because he is a Pentecostal minister whose church has at times been at odds with Mormonism, Sharpton may have been moved to take his shot at the Mormons.
The Mormons finally backed away from their bar against blacks after church leaders claimed they received a revelation from God in 1978 that declared that blacks were now equals. That was a decade and a half after the great civil rights battles of the 1960s. Mormon leaders claim that they have convincingly junked their racist past. They tout their much publicized genealogical research on African-American families, their aggressive missions in Africa, and the handful of blacks who serve in the important church body known as the Quorum of the Seventy to prove it.
Yet Mormon leaders have rejected calls for the church to apologize for its century-plus defense of Biblical touted racism. The closest they came was in 1998, when under pressure from influential African-American Mormons, the Mormon ruling council the First Presidency and the Twelve Apostles debated whether to issue a "clarification" of the issue.
It didn't happen. The council told reporters that they'd let the revelation speak for itself and quietly let the matter drop. That angered some black Mormons. They rightly insisted that while the church had reformed its teaching and practices, the stigma it put on blackness still stood, and that it had made no effort to educate its flock as to why that was wrong.
Mormon efforts for change are certainly commendable. But refusing to go any further than the "revelation" on race stirs strong suspicion that the attitudes of many rank and file Mormons are still frozen in time. The inherent social conservatism in the Mormon faith and practices further deepens the suspicion that if Romney is the GOP chosen one and actually beats a path to the White House, he isn't likely to make diversity the watchword of his administration. He's even less likely to do what President Bush did and appoint a bevy of high profile African-Americans to top echelon positions.
Romney's record as Massachusetts' governor is even less reassuring on diversity. In his last year in office, the Massachusetts Women's Bar Association pounded on him to appoint more minorities and women to the state bench. He did. But by then Romney had his eye firmly on a presidential bid. That put him in the national public spotlight, and his record on diversity would be closely scrutinized.
During his excursion to Mormon headquarters in Salt Lake City, Sharpton said and did all the right things to show that he's ready and willing to make peace with the Mormon faith. But he did not apologize to Romney for his blast. For his part, Romney chalked Sharpton's knock against him up to bigotry. Romney was right.
However, Sharpton's remark did refocus attention on the Mormon's shameful past, one that church leaders have not totally rebuked. While religion shouldn't be an issue in determining who's fit to sit in the White House, it becomes an issue if it blinds a president to the crucial need for diversity. The jury is way out on Romney on that issue.
Comments? Send a letter to the editor.
Albion Monitor May
23, 2007 (http://www.albionmonitor.com)
All Rights Reserved.
Contact firstname.lastname@example.org for permission to use in any format.