"The message they are trying to send is that (the abuse) all stopped at the lowest level in the chain of command and that it didn't have anything to do with command," said Georgetown law and philosophy professor David J. Luban. "I think that there's maybe a second message there as well. It's a little odd that the one thing Jordan's been convicted of is talking about the investigation. He refused to go along with a cover-up."
A June 2007 Seymour Hersh article in the New Yorker contained interviews with Major General Antonio Taguba who admitted that he had suspicions that Jordan and his subordinates were receiving directions in interrogation techniques from sources higher up in the chain of command.
Taguba, who wrote the initial 2004 report on abuses at Abu Ghraib, was reassigned and retired earlier this year.
The verdict means that no officers will be held criminally responsible for the abuses in 2003, leaving most of the blame to fall on 11 low-ranking soldiers who appeared in a series of digital photos that showed detainees being intimidated by dogs, wearing hoods, being forced to pose naked in pyramids, and being forced to participate in sexual acts.
"This leaves a curious record in prosecutions coming out of Abu Ghraib," wrote human rights advocate and Harper's magazine blogger Scott Horton. "Accountability, it seems, is something which applies to enlisted personnel and noncommissioned officers who make the mistake of being caught in photographs. The officers who were supposedly in charge of the facility and giving them guidance escape without serious punishment."
This trend, Horton argues, goes all the way to the top. "After the Abu Ghraib scandal, a commission composed of close friends of Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld and headed by former Secretary of Defense [James] Schlesinger issued a report which exculpated Rumsfeld without ever interviewing him or examining any evidence of his involvement, or that of others in the Office of Secretary of Defense, in the affair."
Indeed, reports of similar interrogation techniques at the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba does suggest that higher ranking officers or Defense Department officials may have authorized some, if not all, of the techniques used on prisoners.
"I've talked to interrogators who said, 'Don't think Abu Ghraib was an aberration,'" said Luban.
Military police at Abu Ghraib's tier 1A, where detainees of high intelligence value were held, have stated that they were instructed on what techniques to employ on detainees by higher-ranking interrogators and civilian contractors.
A U.S. Justice Department investigation has not yet produced any charges against civilian contractors who were present at Abu Ghraib or instructing soldiers who guarded detainees.
"What the jurors said is that this guy was not in the chain of command so maybe command responsibility cannot be used against him. But the fact that he's the only officer who's been charged... I would say this is largely a whitewash," said Luban. "It's all part of this myth that what we're doing in the interrogation of detainees is careful and humane and if bad stuff happens it's bad apples at the bottom of the barrel."
Comments? Send a letter to the editor.
Albion Monitor August
31, 2007 (http://www.albionmonitor.com)
All Rights Reserved.
Contact email@example.com for permission to use in any format.